BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//NEWMOA - Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association - ECPv6.17.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:NEWMOA - Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.newmoa.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for NEWMOA - Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20070311T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20071104T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20080309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20081102T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20090308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20091101T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20080318T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20080318T153000
DTSTAMP:20220804T192805Z
CREATED:20220803T185204Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220804T192805Z
UID:10000305-1205830800-1205854200@www.newmoa.org
SUMMARY:The Common Measures Lessons Learned Meeting
DESCRIPTION:Agenda \n9:00 Continental Breakfast \n9:30 Welcome and Introduction\nImportant Context – Please keep in mind the following questions as we review Phases 1\, 2 & 3: \n\nIf you were to duplicate this Project\, what aspects worked well?\nWere there any barriers and if so\, how did you overcome them?\nIf we were to do this again\, how could it be improved?\n\n9:40 Review of Phase 1: Orientation and Development \n\nProject kick-off meeting – goals\, preliminary discussion of candidate groups for measurement\, understanding performance indicator choices\, understanding data quality choices\, characteristics and limitations – June 23\, 2006\n\nWhat worked well and why?\nWere there any barriers and if so\, how did you overcome them?\nIf we were to do this again\, how could it be improved?\n\n\nIntroductory Measurement and Quality Training Course on indicators\, introduction to statistics\, benchmarking and comparison\, establishing a universe\, principles of good data collection – September 28\, 2006\nWhat worked well and why?\nWere there any barriers and if so\, how did you overcome them?\nIf we were to do this again\, how could it be improved?\n\n11:00 Break \n11:15 Review of Phase 2: Decisions on Groups\, Indicators and Data Choices \n\nGroup preferences exercise\nGroup and Indicator Packet Exercise\nWorkshop on selecting final draft SQG performance indicators – March 13\, 2007\n\nDefinitions\, data source and data quality issues\nAggregating and selecting draft performance indicators for SQGs and Auto Body\n\n\nAuto Body Workshop – October 23\, 2007\n\nDefinition\, universe\, applicability issues\nDraft measurement indicators and desired degree of alignment with the proposed EPA paint striping and miscellaneous coatings rule\n\n\nState sign-off on final SQG indicators and final SQG compliance verification strategies\nState sign-off on final auto body indicators and final compliance verification strategy\n\nWhat worked well and why?\nWere there any barriers and if so\, how did you overcome them?\nIf we were to do this again\, how could it be improved?\n\n\n\n12:15 Lunch Break – (lunch provided) \n12:45 Review of Phase 3: Data Collection and Transfer \n\nDeveloped statistical methods for SQG and Auto Body data collection including state-specific inspection numbers for a range of confidence intervals based on each states sector universe size\nUniverse Identification Methodologies and Random Sample Log for SQGs and Auto Body\nDeveloped and distributed final SQG and Auto Body model checklist\nConducted SQG and Auto Body field data collection training for states’ “evaluators” e.g.\, inspectors\, interns. – SQG May 23\, 2007\, Auto Body January 31\, 2008\nData Quality Certification of Standards for SQG and Auto Body sectors\n\nWhat worked well and why?\nWere there any barriers and if so\, how did you overcome them?\nIf we were to do this again\, how could it be improved?\n\n\n\n1:45 State-by-State Experience \n\nYour State’s Overall Experience\n\nIn doing this Project\, what worked well in your state and why?\nWere there any barriers and if so\, how did you overcome them?\nIf we were to do this Project again\, how could it be improved?\n\n\nVision Statement of the Project\n\nThe use of ERP-type performance measurement is used broadly and routinely to make environmental program priority and resource allocation decisions.\nThe use of ERP-type measurement is used to look within and beyond an individual state to identify and adopt the most effective and efficient environmental performance improvement strategies for the groups we are responsible for regulating (or influencing).\n\n\nHow close did we come to achieving this in your state?\nDo you think your state will do more ERP-type measurement work?\nIf yes\, what will it take?\n\n3:00 Wrap Up & Next Steps \n3:30 Adjourn
URL:https://www.newmoa.org/event/the-common-measures-lessons-learned-meeting/
LOCATION:The Publick House\, 277 Main St\, Sturbridge\, MA\, 01566\, United States
CATEGORIES:Innovative Strategies
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR